![]()
However, it can maintain the high clocks because the challenging tool Prime95 is executed with ~3.3 GHz. We have already noticed that the components – especially the processor – can reach very high temperatures of almost 100 ☌ (~212 ☏). However, the palm rests are always conveniently cool (less than 30 ☌/~86 ☏). The thermal pictures clearly show the position of the heat pipes from the processors to the fans. We can only see the maximum values of 42 to 44 ☌ (~108 to 111 ☏) during our stress test (Windows). Only the central area (CPU/GPU) warms up while idling and with light workloads, but the average values for the top and the bottom of the base unit are at around 28 ☌ (~82 ☏). We can determine only small differences for the chassis temperatures between the different models of the MacBook Pro 15. As with the processor, the GPU performance is not reduced on battery power. #Apple 2016 macbook pro 15 upgradeThe smaller Radeon Pro 450 is beaten by 40 to 50% in general, so the GPU upgrade is the best way to increase the performance of the current MacBook Pro. However, the two new Pascal GPUs GeForce GTX 1050 and GTX 1050 Ti are another 30 and 70% faster in the current 3DMark. The OpenGL performance is on par with the Nvidia Quadro M1000M and roughly 10% behind the Quadro M2000M according to the Unigine Valley benchmark. The Radeon Pro 460 is sitting on the expected level between the Nvidia GTX 960M and the GTX 965M both in 3DMark 11 as well as 3DMark Fire Strike (GPU subscores). We used 3DMark (Windows Bootcamp) for the benchmarks. #Apple 2016 macbook pro 15 windowsMacOS will automatically switch between the dedicated Radeon GPU and the integrated Intel HD Graphics 530 depending on the workload, but Windows (Bootcamp) can only use the dedicated GPU. Another difference is the VRAM, because only the 460 is equipped with 4 GB GDDR5 VRAM. #Apple 2016 macbook pro 15 fullUnlike the two less powerful models Radeon Pro 450 and Radeon Pro 455, however, the 460 utilizes the full number of shaders (1024). The dedicated graphics card is the AMD Radeon Pro 460, which is based on the smaller Polaris 11 chip. More benchmarks with the Core i7-6920HQ are listed in our Tech section. The processor performance is not reduced on battery power. However, the Kaby Lake chips will most probably not be available until the refresh next autumn. A comparable Core i7-7920HQ should be another 10% faster. The Core i7-6920HQ is certainly a powerful processor, but only slightly faster compared to the new Kaby Lake Core i7-7700HQ. Power users that require every bit of performance have another problem right now. At least, normal users will not notice a difference in practice. ![]() It is questionable whether this justifies an additional charge of $300. Even the extremely demanding tool Prime95 is executed with a steady clock of 3.3 GHz – a very good result.īut how does the more expensive MacBook Pro perform within our comparison group? The advantage over the base processor Core i7-6700HQ is 10 to 15% and only 5 to 8% over the i7-6820HQ. We can see a processor temperature of up to 97 ☌ (~207 ☏) in the benchmarks, but the maximum clock of 3.4 GHz can be maintained. Instead, we focus on the (additional) performance of the components and the effects on the emissions as well as the battery runtimes. All this information is available in our in-depth review of the entry-level model with the Core i7-6700HQ and the Radeon Pro 450. The two models of the current MacBook Pro 15 obviously use the same chassis constructions, so we will not cover sections such as the Case, Connectivity, Input Devices, or Speakers in this article. While the entry-level model is available for $2399, Apple charges $3499 for the test model. ![]() Our test sample today is the high-end model, where we checked (almost) all upgrade boxes in Apple's online store: Core i7-6920HQ (Skylake), 16 GB LPDDR3 RAM, 1 TB PCIe-SSD, and AMD Radeon Pro 460. This includes the great case, the excellent display, and the low emissions. Despite some problems, however, the current MacBook Pro is still a good product in many respects. Although 4x Thunderbolt 3 (USB Type-C) make the device quite future-proof, you will need adapters in the foreseeable future. One of the biggest issues is probably the radical change of the port situation. #Apple 2016 macbook pro 15 softwareOur review showed that the functionality mainly depends on the software support, but it can actually make the handling rather more complicated in practice. It is a small display above the keyboard and replaces the function keys. As well as a slimmer and lighter chassis, the big highlight is obviously the Touch Bar. The current MacBook Pro 15 is the first major redesign in the last few years. For the original German review, see here.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |